• How I AI
  • Posts
  • My brain's fried, so here's a little play instead

My brain's fried, so here's a little play instead

On the ethics of using AI to write emails

My brain’s not working great today.

My kid’s having one of those multiple meltdown days that drain you as a parent.

I had 10 things I wanted to get done by now.

Most of them aren’t.

And the email I started working on…I wanted it to be thoughtful.

But I just don’t have the energy for that today.

So instead, I’m sharing something different.

This is a dialogue I had ChatGPT write a while back write based on a prompt I gave it:

Write a conversation between two people debating whether it’s ethical to use AI to write emails. Neither should “win.” Let the tension remain unresolved.

I can’t remember where I got that prompt idea. But it’s a fun one you can try for something that’s controversial in your industry/space.

Here’s what it came up with.

Title: “Just Hit Send”

Characters:

Sam – Founder of a small online business, uses AI tools extensively.

Alex – Copywriter and long-time friend, skeptical about AI’s impact on creativity and communication.

[Scene: A quiet corner of a coffee shop. Both are sipping lattes, laptops open, emails on screen.]

Alex:

So, you’re really okay with letting a robot write your emails now?

Sam:

“Letting a robot” is a stretch. It’s a tool. I still guide the message. The AI just helps me write it faster.

Alex:

Faster isn’t always better. Email is personal. It’s connection. If you’re outsourcing that to a machine, what does that say?

Sam:

It says I’m busy. It says I value my time. And honestly, AI helps me say what I mean more clearly. It doesn’t replace me—it amplifies me.

Alex:

Does it though? Or does it just mimic the patterns it’s been trained on? You’re not communicating—you’re optimizing. There's a difference.

Sam:

Optimization is communication in business. Clarity, brevity, impact. If the end result connects with people and gets them to take action, who cares if it had a little help?

Alex:

But what about the craft? The voice? The nuance? I’ve seen AI-generated emails. They’re clean, sure. But they have no soul. No friction. Nothing to make me stop and feel something.

Sam:

That’s a generalization. You can train it. Guide it. Make it sound like you. The tech’s getting better every day. Some of my best-performing emails were AI-assisted. My audience didn’t complain.

Alex:

Maybe they didn’t know. Maybe they’re just used to surface-level communication now. Or maybe they just don’t expect anything real anymore.

Sam:

So what’s the alternative? Burnout from writing every email manually? Being inconsistent? Watching opportunities pass because I’m stuck chasing the perfect sentence?

Alex:

Maybe. Or maybe it’s choosing integrity over scale. Presence over productivity. Maybe there’s value in doing it the hard way, because it means something.

Sam:

Or maybe that’s a romanticized view of work that’s no longer sustainable. I still care. I just don’t think caring means doing it all myself.

[Pause. They sip in silence.]

Alex:

I guess it depends on what kind of relationship you want with your audience.

Sam:

Yeah. And maybe it depends on what kind of relationship you want with yourself.

[They both stare at their screens. One cursor blinking. One email unsent.]

Which one do you agree with more?

Hit reply and let me know.

Nathan

If you’re stuck on your newsletter, lead magnet, or AI setup, book a coaching session at this link and I’ll help you sort it out step by step so you can move forward with confidence and a plan.

Were you forwarded this email? Click here to subscribe.

What did you think of today's edition?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.